Insurance Brokers marketing
Grow the book, not just the new business number
A policy is an annuity with a renewal date attached, so a broking business is won and lost at renewal rather than at first sale. Commercial and personal lines behave nothing alike, and comparison sites sit between you and half the market.
What usually goes wrong
Where insurance broker marketing tends to fail
A brokerage is not really in the business of selling policies. It is in the business of holding them, because the value of a client is the sum of the renewals that follow the first one, and almost none of that shows up in a new business report.
That single fact reorganises the marketing. It puts renewal at the centre rather than at the end, it makes cross-sell depth a growth channel, and it makes the classes you choose to write more consequential than the volume of quotes you receive.
- The whole budget goes to new business and none of it goes to renewal.
- Retention is where a broking book is actually built, and it is usually left entirely to the account handler and a renewal invitation letter. A few points of retention compounds into a materially different business within a few years, and it is far cheaper to buy than the equivalent new business. If a brokerage has never run a renewal programme, that is normally the highest-return work available to it.
- Commercial and personal lines run through one brand and one website.
- A homeowner comparing motor premiums and a manufacturer buying liability and business interruption cover share nothing: not the trigger, not the decision process, not the price sensitivity, not the vocabulary. Serving both from one homepage produces a site that reads as consumer-facing to a commercial buyer and as intimidating to a consumer, and the commercial business is invariably the one that suffers.
- You are competing with comparison sites on their own ground.
- For most personal lines, aggregators intermediate the whole market and rank for the searches. Trying to outrank or outbid them on price-led terms is a losing position for a broker, because the aggregator can show twenty quotes and you can show one. The winnable ground is the risks aggregators handle badly: non-standard properties, unusual occupations, high-value items, previous claims and anything requiring an actual conversation.
- Nobody markets to the renewal date, even though it is in the system.
- Every policy has a date on which the client is free to leave, and it is known months in advance. Most brokerages touch that date once, with a renewal invitation that arrives close enough to the deadline to prompt shopping. A programme that starts earlier, reviews the cover rather than restating the premium, and surfaces the cross-sell gaps turns the most dangerous moment in the relationship into the most productive one.
- Reputation is produced by the claims team and ignored by marketing.
- Clients form their real opinion of a broker at claim time, which is also when they are most inclined to say something publicly. Brokerages that build a deliberate touchpoint into the claims process collect reviews that describe the one thing prospects actually want to know. Those that do not are left with reviews written by people who bought a policy and never used it, which persuade nobody.
- The website invites quotes for risks you do not want to write.
- A generic quote form attracts every risk in the market, including the ones with no appetite behind them. Account handlers then spend hours on submissions that were never placeable. Class-specific pages, a form that captures enough to screen the risk, and a plain statement of what the brokerage does not write will reduce quote volume and raise the bind rate at the same time.
Where the money goes
The channels that earn their place here
In priority order for this business, not a menu. Anything not on this list is something we would need a specific reason to recommend.
A renewal programme, because renewal is the business
Listed first deliberately. The value of a client is the sum of their renewals, and most brokerages touch that date once with an invitation letter. An earlier, structured sequence that reviews cover rather than restating premium, surfaces cross-sell gaps and reaches the client before they start shopping is usually the cheapest growth available.
Own the commercial classes you actually want to write
A page per class of business, written for the trade rather than for insurance generally, covering the exposures that trade carries and the limits their contracts usually demand. Volume is modest and competition is thin, because most brokers publish one commercial insurance page and stop. These pages also give account executives something credible to send.
Reviews collected at claim stage
Clients form their real view of a broker when a claim happens, and that is what prospects want to read. Building a deliberate request into the claims process, within whatever your regulator permits, produces reviews about the moment that matters instead of reviews from people who never used the policy.
Explain cover, not price
Price is where aggregators win and where the rules restrict you most. Clear explanations of what a cover does, where the common gaps sit and what a contract requirement actually means attract buyers before they have a quote in hand, and position the brokerage as the party who understood the risk rather than the party who was cheapest.
A quote path that screens the risk
A generic form produces submissions with no appetite behind them and burns handler time. Class-specific journeys that capture trade, turnover, claims history and the limits required let you route or decline before anyone starts work, and an explicit statement of what you do not write filters more effectively than any qualifying question.
Demand shape
When and how the demand actually arrives
Demand is calendarised in a way almost no other sector matches. Every policy has a renewal date, the shopping window opens a few weeks before it, and outside that window the client is effectively unavailable. This makes demand highly forecastable for your own book and largely invisible in search data.
Commercial renewals cluster around common dates, and any brokerage already knows its own distribution. Planning capacity, outbound activity and content around those clusters is more productive than a flat monthly plan.
Search volume is inverted relative to opportunity. Personal lines produces most of the searches and is intercepted by aggregators; commercial classes produce a fraction of the volume with no aggregator layer, higher value and far weaker competition.
Life and business events create genuinely new demand rather than shopping behaviour: a first employee, a new vehicle, a property purchase, a new contract with insurance requirements attached, a business acquisition. These convert far better than price-led searches because there is no incumbent policy to compare against.
Market cycles move everyone at once. When premiums harden sharply across a class, shopping behaviour rises across the whole market, which is an acquisition opportunity and a retention threat in the same quarter.
Search behaviour
What your customers are typing
Commercial, class specific
Thin volume, no aggregator layer, and the buyer is looking for someone who knows the trade.
- public liability insurance for electricians
- professional indemnity insurance for architects
- cyber insurance for small business
- restaurant insurance quote
- insurance for a haulage company
- contractors all risks insurance
Requirement driven
Someone has been told to obtain a specific cover with a specific limit. Deadline attached and no incumbent policy.
- do i need employers liability insurance
- landlord requires certificate of insurance
- insurance requirements for a construction contract
- minimum professional indemnity limit for consultants
- certificate of insurance for an event venue
Cover questions
Research rather than purchase, and the ground where brokers can be genuinely useful without quoting.
- what does professional indemnity cover
- difference between public and product liability
- is business interruption covered by my policy
- what is an insurance excess
- does home insurance cover flood damage
Non-standard and problem risks
What comparison sites handle badly. The most winnable personal lines demand a broker has.
- insurance for a thatched property
- car insurance after a claim
- unoccupied property insurance
- insurance broker near me for non standard risk
- insurer refused to renew my policy
These are examples of how customers in this market search, drawn from keyword research and from the questions that come up on sales calls. They are illustrative, not a volume claim — the actual demand in your area is something we size before recommending anything.
The website
What the site has to do for this customer
- A page for each class of business you genuinely want, written in the language of that trade
- An explicit statement of the risks the brokerage does not write, which filters better than any form field
- Regulatory registration and licensing shown clearly, along with the markets and insurers you can access
- A quote journey that captures enough to screen the risk instead of a single generic contact form
- A plain description of what the broker does when a claim happens, since that is what the client is really buying
- The renewal process explained, including when the client will hear from you and what will be reviewed
- Named account handlers and executives, because commercial clients want to know who will pick up the phone
- Documents and certificates signposted clearly, as this is the most common reason an existing client visits the site
Buying behaviour
How your customers actually decide
Strategy follows this, not the other way round. Everything on this page is downstream of how the decision genuinely gets made.
- In personal lines the shortlist is usually produced by an aggregator, so the broker is chosen after price has already been filtered. What wins from there is being reachable, being able to handle something the comparison site could not, and looking like a real business with real people.
- In commercial lines the decision is about whether you understand the trade. A broker who knows the specific exposures of a class, and can say so without being prompted, beats a faster quote from a generalist almost every time.
- Access to markets matters and buyers increasingly ask about it directly. Whether you can place an unusual risk, and which insurers you can approach, is a practical question that determines whether the conversation continues.
- Claims reputation is the strongest single signal, and it is read in reviews rather than on your website. A prospect wants evidence of what happened when something went wrong, not a paragraph about your service ethos.
- Inertia is powerful and underestimated. Most commercial clients stay where they are until a renewal price jumps, a claim is handled badly or a requirement changes, which means timing the approach matters more than the strength of the pitch.
- A specific external requirement often drives the whole purchase. A landlord, a contract, a licensing body or a customer demands a particular cover with a minimum limit, and the buyer searches for that requirement by name rather than for insurance in general.
Constraints
What the rules allow, and what they do not
Insurance distribution is licensed activity and its advertising is regulated. The recurring constraints are disclosure of the regulated entity and its registration number, rules governing whether a firm may describe itself as independent or whole-of-market, restrictions on price and cover claims, requirements to make product documentation available, and obligations to retain records of marketing communications.
Content describing what a policy covers is the highest-risk material on a broking website, because any explanation of cover can be read as advice. Every such page needs to be reconciled with the actual wording, to state plainly that cover depends on the policy issued and the individual circumstances, and to be reviewed by someone qualified in the relevant jurisdiction before publication.
Requirements differ substantially between Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom and the United Arab Emirates, including regulators, licence categories, the line between information and advice, and how comparison claims may be framed. Copy approved in one market must be reviewed again before use in another.
Testimonials and reviews carry their own rules in several jurisdictions, and soliciting a review must never be conditioned on anything of value or on the outcome of a claim. Where a regulator restricts testimonials in financial promotions, third-party review platforms are treated differently from quotes reproduced on your own site, and that distinction needs checking locally.
We write with these constraints in mind and flag anything requiring judgement, but responsibility for compliance stays with the brokerage. Every claim about cover, price, independence or regulatory status must be confirmed with your own compliance function or regulator, and we do not provide legal, regulatory or financial advice.
Questions
Questions we get from this industry
Where should we spend if we can only fund one thing?
Renewal, in almost every case. Retention compounds into the value of the book, it is cheaper to influence than new business, and most brokerages have never run a structured programme against it.
The exception is a brokerage deliberately moving into a new class of business, where there is no book to retain yet and the whole task is establishing that you write that class credibly.
Can we compete with comparison sites in personal lines?
Not on price-led searches, and it is better to accept that early. An aggregator can display twenty quotes on the page where you can display one, and the searches reflect that.
You can compete where they are weak: non-standard properties, unusual occupations, high-value contents, previous claims, refused renewals, and anything that needs a conversation. That demand is smaller, considerably less contested, and it produces clients who stay because price was never the only reason they came.
How do we get reviews when clients only think about insurance once a year?
Ask at claim stage rather than at renewal. A client who has just been through a claim has an opinion worth publishing and a reason to share it, and it is the experience every prospect is trying to assess.
Check the request against your own rules first. Nothing may be conditioned on the review or on the outcome, and some regulators restrict testimonials in financial promotions, which affects how you can use them once collected.
Should our commercial and personal lines be on the same website?
They can share a domain, but they should not share a front door. The two buyers have nothing in common, and a homepage that tries to greet both ends up reading as consumer-facing to a commercial buyer, which costs you the more valuable side.
Distinct sections, distinct navigation and distinct enquiry journeys are usually sufficient. Some brokerages separate the brands entirely, which works when the commercial proposition is specialised enough to stand on its own.
Why is a mortgage brokerage marketed so differently from an insurance brokerage?
Because the revenue behaves differently. A mortgage is a transaction that completes and then goes quiet for years, so the marketing is built around capturing an event and around the referral partners who see that event first.
A policy renews, so the client is a recurring asset with a date attached. That puts retention, cross-sell and claims experience at the centre of the plan, and it makes the choice of which classes to write far more consequential than the number of enquiries received.
Find out what is realistically winnable in your market
A strategy call is a working session on your insurance broker business specifically — your area, your competitors, the searches that matter and what it would take to compete for them. If we do not think we can move it, we will tell you.
If we don't deliver the work we agreed to deliver for reasons within our control, you don't pay for the undelivered work. Read our guarantee
Last updated · Reviewed by Zubair Afzal